Search campaigns
Intent-led structure, deliberate match types and a maintained negative list.
Google's automation genuinely helps once the inputs are right: accurate conversion data, a sane campaign structure, strong creative and clean audience signals. Fed bad inputs, the same automation confidently spends your budget on the wrong traffic, and the in-platform recommendations will encourage it.
We treat automation as a tool with a firm hand on the inputs. Conversions defined around revenue, Performance Max fed proper asset groups and exclusions, Search protected with intent-led structure and negatives, and every automated recommendation reviewed rather than auto-applied.
PMax reaches Search, Shopping, Display, YouTube, Gmail and Discover from one campaign, and it reports on almost none of it in detail. Run without controls, it will find the cheapest conversions available, which are usually your own brand searches, traffic you already had.
The controls that make it work: brand exclusions, properly built asset groups rather than one generic set, audience signals that describe your actual buyer, a feed if you sell products, and supplementary reporting via scripts or the API to see what it is spending on. With those in place it performs; without them it flatters itself.
Broad match plus smart bidding is the platform's preferred configuration and it can work well, but only with a maintained negative list and enough conversion volume to learn from. Below that threshold it buys traffic that has nothing to do with your business.
We run exact and phrase where control matters, broad where signals are strong, and review search terms weekly. In most Indian accounts, the negative list is the highest-value asset in the account after the conversion tracking.
If every conversion is worth 1, the algorithm will optimise towards whichever is easiest to get. Assigning real values (a quote request is worth more than a brochure download, a wedding booking more than a day pass) changes what the automation chases.
Where you can send offline conversions back, better again: the account then optimises towards the leads that became customers, which is the closest a platform can get to optimising for revenue.
Responsive search ads pull from the headlines and descriptions you supply, so a set of fifteen near-identical headlines gives the system nothing to test. Distinct angles (price, speed, guarantee, specialism, objection) produce combinations that actually differ.
We write to that, review asset performance monthly, retire the weak ones and replace them, rather than writing an ad set once at launch and reporting on it for two years.
Call, WhatsApp or email. You will get a straight answer about google ads management — including whether you actually need it.
Every engagement is scoped in writing before work starts, so you know exactly what is being delivered and when.
Intent-led structure, deliberate match types and a maintained negative list.
Asset groups, audience signals, brand exclusions and reporting past the black box.
Feed quality first: titles, attributes and structure drive Shopping performance.
Upper-funnel work measured on assisted conversions, not on last click.
Enhanced conversions and offline import so the platform optimises to revenue.
Auto-apply disabled, every suggestion reviewed on its merits.
Scopes are written down, reporting is monthly, and the accounts stay in your name. Ask for a reference in your sector before you commit to anything.
Structure, match types, negatives, tracking integrity and what a genuine conversion is.
Campaigns grouped by intent and margin so budget follows the money, not the clicks.
Ad copy and landing experiences produced together, then tested against each other.
Daily hygiene: search terms, placements, audiences, device and geography.
Not clicks. Not impressions. What each rupee of spend returned.
Strategy, creative, media, web and print sit in the same office. Nothing is lost in a handover between three suppliers who each blame the other.
You get a document listing deliverables and dates before work starts, so 'in progress' always means something specific.
Ad accounts, analytics, domain, extranets and source files stay in your name. We are given access; we never become the owner.
Monthly reporting in plain language, with the misses named as clearly as the wins, and next month's changes agreed before it starts.
The person who scoped your work is the person doing it. No rotating bench of juniors learning on your budget.
Head office in Thrissur, branch office in New Delhi, so North and South accounts both get people in the same time zone and, when it matters, in the room.
Monthly engagements with a notice period, not annual contracts. If we are not earning the retainer you should be able to leave.
The briefs we are asked for most often under this service. If yours is not listed, describe it in the form — the answer is usually yes.
Often yes, but only with brand exclusions, proper asset groups and a way to see what it is actually spending on. Left unsupervised it will cannibalise brand traffic and call it success.
Usually yes, defensively: competitors bid on your name. But it should be reported separately, because brand conversions flatter blended numbers.
Yes, where there is enough conversion data to support it. Below that threshold, manual control performs better and we will hold there until the data justifies switching.
Send us the site or the property. You get an honest read on the gap, the effort and the timeline — before any money changes hands.