Entity definition
Who you are, what you do and where, stated consistently and machine-readably.
When someone asks an assistant to recommend a supplier, the answer is assembled from sources the model trusts and can verify. That is a different game from ranking: it rewards clear entity definition, consistent facts across the web, third-party corroboration and content structured so a specific claim can be lifted and attributed.
GEO work builds exactly that. We make your entity unambiguous, get your facts consistent everywhere they appear, earn citations on the sources these systems actually read, and restructure key pages so answers are extractable. Then we monitor which engines mention you, and for which prompts.
When someone asks an assistant to recommend a supplier, compare options or explain a category, the answer is assembled from sources the model can retrieve, corroborate and attribute. That is a different competition from ranking, and it rewards different things.
Clear entity definition. Facts that agree with each other everywhere they appear. Third-party corroboration on sources these systems weight. And content structured so a specific claim can be lifted and attributed cleanly rather than being buried in a paragraph of marketing language.
Generative systems need to know what kind of organisation you are, what you do, where you operate and how you relate to other entities they already understand. If your name is inconsistent across the web, your address differs between directories, or your claims vary between your site and your profiles, that ambiguity costs you citations.
So the first phase is an audit of everything the web currently says about you, and a clean-up so it agrees. It is the same discipline as citation work in local SEO, applied to a wider set of facts.
Content written for AI retrieval answers a specific question directly, near the top of a section, in language that stands alone when extracted. Long preambles, marketing throat-clearing and claims without a stated basis all reduce the chance of being quoted.
This is also better for human readers, which is why it is worth doing even if you are sceptical about how large this channel will become.
There is no rank tracker for AI answers. What can be done is to define a prompt set that matters to your business, run it across the major assistants on a schedule, and record whether you are mentioned, how you are described, and who is mentioned instead.
That is directional rather than precise, and we report it as such. Anyone offering you exact AI visibility percentages is inventing them.
Call, WhatsApp or email. You will get a straight answer about geo & ai search optimisation — including whether you actually need it.
Every engagement is scoped in writing before work starts, so you know exactly what is being delivered and when.
Who you are, what you do and where, stated consistently and machine-readably.
Questions answered directly and specifically, so a passage can be quoted.
Presence on the third-party sources these systems weight heavily.
Organisation, service, FAQ and author markup implemented thoroughly.
Tracking which assistants mention you, for which prompts, and against whom.
Scopes are written down, reporting is monthly, and the accounts stay in your name. Ask for a reference in your sector before you commit to anything.
Crawl, index coverage, speed, structure and the gap between what you rank for and what you sell.
Demand grouped by buying intent and mapped to a page that deserves to win it.
Pages written, structured and internally linked so each one has a clear job.
Digital PR, citations and entity work, extended to AI answer engines as well as search.
Ranking, traffic quality and assisted revenue reviewed monthly against the baseline.
Strategy, creative, media, web and print sit in the same office. Nothing is lost in a handover between three suppliers who each blame the other.
You get a document listing deliverables and dates before work starts, so 'in progress' always means something specific.
Ad accounts, analytics, domain, extranets and source files stay in your name. We are given access; we never become the owner.
Monthly reporting in plain language, with the misses named as clearly as the wins, and next month's changes agreed before it starts.
The person who scoped your work is the person doing it. No rotating bench of juniors learning on your budget.
Head office in Thrissur, branch office in New Delhi, so North and South accounts both get people in the same time zone and, when it matters, in the room.
Monthly engagements with a notice period, not annual contracts. If we are not earning the retainer you should be able to leave.
The briefs we are asked for most often under this service. If yours is not listed, describe it in the form — the answer is usually yes.
It overlaps but is not identical. Good SEO helps; GEO adds entity consistency, corroboration and extractable answer structure specifically for generative systems.
Partly. We track mentions across a defined prompt set per engine. It is directional rather than exact, and we report it that way rather than dressing it up.
It is early, which is the argument for doing it: the work is cheap now and compounding. We would scope it as a slice of an SEO programme, not as a replacement for one.
Send us the site or the property. You get an honest read on the gap, the effort and the timeline — before any money changes hands.