Import and rebuild
Google structure imported, then adapted rather than mirrored.
Microsoft Advertising is routinely ignored because the volume looks small next to Google. That is the wrong comparison: what matters is cost per acquisition, and on Bing the auction is thinner, clicks are cheaper, and the audience skews towards desktop, corporate and older users. For B2B and considered purchases that mix converts well.
We import from Google as a starting point, then rebuild rather than leave it as a copy: negatives, bids and copy differ by platform, and LinkedIn profile targeting is a capability Google simply does not have.
Microsoft Advertising carries a fraction of Google's volume, which is why most Indian advertisers ignore it. That is the wrong comparison. What matters is cost per acquisition, and in a thinner auction with a desktop-heavy, corporate-heavy, older audience, that number is frequently better, particularly for B2B and considered purchases.
It is also the default engine on a large share of managed corporate devices, which is precisely where a procurement or IT buyer is searching from.
Importing from Google is the sensible way to start and a poor way to finish. Match behaviour differs, search term patterns differ, competition differs by keyword, and the negative list that works on Google will not be the right one here.
We import, then restructure and rebuild the negatives against actual Microsoft search term data over the first weeks.
Microsoft can layer company, industry and job function targeting from LinkedIn onto search campaigns. Nothing in Google Ads does this, and for B2B it changes the economics of a keyword that would otherwise be too broad to bid on.
Used well, it lets you bid confidently on generic category terms because you are only paying when the searcher matches the buyer profile.
Start at roughly a tenth of your Google spend, measure cost per acquisition honestly over a full cycle, and scale only if it earns it. For youth-skewed consumer categories it frequently will not, and we will tell you that rather than keep a line item alive.
Reporting should always show the two platforms side by side on the same definition of a conversion, or the comparison is meaningless.
Call, WhatsApp or email. You will get a straight answer about microsoft advertising (bing ads) management — including whether you actually need it.
Every engagement is scoped in writing before work starts, so you know exactly what is being delivered and when.
Google structure imported, then adapted rather than mirrored.
Company, industry and job function targeting layered onto search.
Merchant Centre and Shopping campaigns for the Bing audience.
Search term patterns differ from Google, so the negative list does too.
Google and Microsoft reported side by side on cost per qualified lead.
Scopes are written down, reporting is monthly, and the accounts stay in your name. Ask for a reference in your sector before you commit to anything.
Structure, match types, negatives, tracking integrity and what a genuine conversion is.
Campaigns grouped by intent and margin so budget follows the money, not the clicks.
Ad copy and landing experiences produced together, then tested against each other.
Daily hygiene: search terms, placements, audiences, device and geography.
Not clicks. Not impressions. What each rupee of spend returned.
Strategy, creative, media, web and print sit in the same office. Nothing is lost in a handover between three suppliers who each blame the other.
You get a document listing deliverables and dates before work starts, so 'in progress' always means something specific.
Ad accounts, analytics, domain, extranets and source files stay in your name. We are given access; we never become the owner.
Monthly reporting in plain language, with the misses named as clearly as the wins, and next month's changes agreed before it starts.
The person who scoped your work is the person doing it. No rotating bench of juniors learning on your budget.
Head office in Thrissur, branch office in New Delhi, so North and South accounts both get people in the same time zone and, when it matters, in the room.
Monthly engagements with a notice period, not annual contracts. If we are not earning the retainer you should be able to leave.
The briefs we are asked for most often under this service. If yours is not listed, describe it in the form — the answer is usually yes.
For B2B and considered purchases, usually yes: cost per acquisition is often materially lower. For youth-skewed consumer categories, often not, and we will say so.
As a starting point. Left as a straight copy it underperforms, because match behaviour and search term patterns differ.
Start small (around a tenth of Google spend), measure cost per acquisition, then scale if it earns it.
Send us the site or the property. You get an honest read on the gap, the effort and the timeline — before any money changes hands.